• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to Principle Filters
  • Skip to Principle Results

SALT.

Search Toggle
  • What is Salt?
  • Principles
  • Seascape Map
  • Story Hub
  • Get Involved
  • Dive Deeper
  • Search Toggle

Dive Deeper

Browse Our One-Stop-Shop of Traceability Resources

Dive deeper into our global collection of resources to improve traceable, responsible, and legally harvested seafood.

  • Skip to Topics Filter
  • Skip to Regions Filter
  • Skip to Types Filter
  • Skip to keyword input
  • Skip to Dive Deeper Results
Clear Filters
Is your resource missing? Submit Resource
Is Your Effort Missing? Submit Effort
  • Guidance Document

Fisheries Governance Tool: Guidance Document

MRAG Americas
2020
A collaboration of key factors driving fisheries governance have been defined in this document, holding stakeholders at the core and refining the goals for effective processes. Connected by three components (policy, capacity, and performance) guidance forms a layered approach to evaluating current fisheries management structure and track governance progress.Press enter to go to this resource, Fisheries Governance Tool: Guidance Document
  • Guidance Document

Understanding Costs for Traceability Technology Implementation

Future of Fish
Implementation of technological systems requires time and money, and, when allocated appropriately, can lead to increased understanding of the operating systems and their management. A brief breakdown of the stages, methods, time frames, and costs within developing traceability systems are presented, showing the requirements of each stage and the process from start to finish.Press enter to go to this resource, Understanding Costs for Traceability Technology Implementation
  • Guidance Document

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Improving food security & reducing poverty through intra-regional fish trade

World Fish
2017
This framework provides a description of practical information the Fish Trade project requires for operationalizing and implementing a functioning monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework, enabling results for decision making. This case study demonstrates the use M&E framework to set indicators, guidelines, and facilitate coordination across stakeholder groups.Press enter to go to this resource, Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Improving food security & reducing poverty through intra-regional fish trade
  • Report

Towards Interoperable Fisheries Data Systems in the U.S.

MRAG Americas
2017
The range of fisheries data users globally has increased, so the ability for these systems to communicate and transfer data seamlessly proves to be of importance, as it aids the development of policies and management plans. To meet this need, this report compiles stakeholder interviews and literature reviews to inform how the U.S. can modernize…Press enter to go to this resource, Towards Interoperable Fisheries Data Systems in the U.S.
  • Report

Tracking Progress: Assessing Business Responses to Forced Labour and Human Trafficking in the Thai Seafood Industry

Praxis Labs
2019
Heightened interest has developed with regards to the seafood industry’s forced labour within Thai fisheries and efforts are being initiated to address gaps in current practices. Chapter 3 discusses policy reforms alongside corporate responses (Chapter 2) to address and prevent the abuse in Thai seafood supply chains. Interviews with stakeholders shed light on the challenges…Press enter to go to this resource, Tracking Progress: Assessing Business Responses to Forced Labour and Human Trafficking in the Thai Seafood Industry
  • Tool / Toolkit

The Fisheries Governance Tool

MRAG Americas and the Walton Family Foundation
The Fisheries Governance Tool provides indicator-based analyses to determine the performance of countries’ fisheries management systems. This diagnostic tool can measure progress over time of fisheries management by identifying gaps in the structure and functionality as well as assessing the capacity and progress towards targets.Press enter to go to this resource, The Fisheries Governance Tool
  • Case Study

Learning Site Profile: General Santos, Philippines

USAID
This Site Profile provides an overview of why it was selected as one of USAID's pilot sites, including the site’s regional significance, biodiversity, and key economic and fisheries data. Priority challenges and opportunities are also presented in this brief overview.Press enter to go to this resource, Learning Site Profile: General Santos, Philippines
  • Report

Indonesia Value Chain Assessment

USAID Oceans
2017
This value chain assessment of tuna fisheries in Bitung, Indonesia, was a key first step to understand the catch documentation and traceability processes and requirements along the value chain. This report identifies the main exporting markets, explores market requirements, and informs the CDT design approach, partnership development and industry engagement in Bitung and along the…Press enter to go to this resource, Indonesia Value Chain Assessment
  • Peer Reviewed Article

Tools and Technologies for the Monitoring, Control and Surveillance of Unwanted Catches

James et al.
2019
This paper first provides an overall synthesis of the pro’s and con’s of several monitoring tools and technologies. Four electronic monitoring (EM) technologies already trialled in EU fisheries are then summarized.Press enter to go to this resource, Tools and Technologies for the Monitoring, Control and Surveillance of Unwanted Catches
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 32
  • Next Page
RECEIVE UPDATES FROM SALT SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Footer Logo
  • What is Salt?
  • Principles
  • Seascape Map
  • Story Hub
  • Get Involved
  • Dive Deeper
  • Linkedin
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 SALT

This product is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of FishWise and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.